[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Double" Licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: "Double" Licenses
- From: melas@ils.unc.edu (Steven Melamut)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:03:55 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The publishers contract is with the institution. If there is a subsequent lawsuit resulting from that contract, the publisher will sue the institution because that is where the money is. It is unlikely that anyone will want to chase students and faculty. Creating a secondary license serves two other possible purposes: (1) Educating the end-user as to any restrictions that have been agreed to by the institution. It is necessary for someone to make them aware that there are restrictions upon use of the material. (2) Giving those restrictions an aura of legality that will deter most abusers. The publisher does not want to go to court, they merely want the terms of the contract to be respected. They certainly don't want to have to track down every student or faculty member that has used the material. Perhaps the publishers would agree to forgo these warnings if the institution wants to explain the restrictions itself. It is in the institutions best interests that users do not violate the license agreements. ****************************************************** Steven Melamut Kathrine R. Everett Law Library University of North Carolina CB #3385 Ridge Road Chapel Hill, NC 27599 melamut@email.unc.edu work: 919-962-1194 fax: 919-962-1193 ******************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Double" Licenses
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Re: "Double" Licenses
- Prev by Date: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Next by Date: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Prev by thread: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Next by thread: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Index(es):