[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Double" Licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: "Double" Licenses
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:49:08 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There is another problem with these licenses. It is the policy of most if not all academic libraries that the readers' use of the library resources is anonymous. Records linking an individual to the use of a specific resource is maintained for local administrative purposes only and kept only while needed (e.g. until a book is returned). Outside sources such as publishers or database suppliers have certainly never been told who specifically is using their material. Under these contracts that would no longer be the case! Some of the contracts do have privacy provisions, but should we be willing to stake our academic freedom on them? I have less objection to a publisher asking for an individual agreement for extra services. If a user wishes a customized alerting service, for example, the database supplier will normally need to know who that person is. We have also usually accepted the provision of individual user information in trials, accepting the temporary nature of the arrangement and the publishers' need to advertise. But can any academic or public library accept this for basic information resources? I have, though, heard rumors that at least one of the major publishers currently offering such licenses is planning to change this requirement. This as always is my personal view, though I strongly suspect that some of my colleagues agree. -- David Goodman Ann Okerson wrote: > > Already this year I've seen two electronic information "deals" that > require two levels of license. That is, the institution]... (library) > negotiates and signs a license with the provider AND then once the reader > goes to the site to retrieve the information, he or she is asked to > "click" to agree to a set of terms and conditions. I.e., two license > agreements are in play: one with the institution and one with each > individual reader. [ ... ] > > Comments please from you publishers, librarians, and lawyers out there? > > Ann Okerson > Associate University Librarian > Yale University > Ann.Okerson@yale.edu -- David Goodman Biology Librarian, Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627
- Prev by Date: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Next by Date: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Prev by thread: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Next by thread: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Index(es):