[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Double" Licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: "Double" Licenses
- From: "Peter B. Boyce" <pboyce@aas.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:04:36 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On the subject of double licenses (which we do not have for the American Astronomical Society journals), and speaking as a publisher, there are a couple of issues. One is that our readers (at least in the early stages of our electronic journals) did not realize that the library actually had to "license" the usage. This is part of the, "everything on the Web is free, isn't it?" syndrome. We have included a splash screen at the beginning of the session which comes on for five seconds and reminds the reader that she/he is reading this by virtue of the license purchased by XXX library. Without this, the general reader was really not aware that this access was something their organization was buying and that it was their hard working librarians which were making their desktop access possible. The splash screen was the least annoying way of reminding the readers that the journal is not free. The second is that we would NEVER get in the reader's way with an additional click license once we had negotiated terms with the institution. What's the point? The Internet has too many annoyances as it is, and to throw yet another impediment into the works is counterproductive. Publishers who are so cautious that they feel constrained to do things like this are missing the boat. The Internet is a different world, and information providers have to work _with_ the readers and institutions, not against them. Moreover, publishers have to embrace the electronic delivery of information wholeheartedly. Finally, publishers have to appeal to that part of the readers which remembers the original camaraderie of the Internet. Double licenses work against the publishers in each of these areas, and serve to indicate to me that those publishers haven't really understood the full potential of electronic publishing. I would bet that their electronic journals are likely to be poor examples of the new genre. I should point out that we do have a password check for those of our members who choose to sign up for an individual license, which is easy to use from any random hotel room. But, this step is skipped when when the reader accesses the journal from some institution. ___________________________________________________ Dr. Peter B. Boyce, Professeur Associe, ULP Centre de Donnees astronomique de Strasbourg, France -- boyce@cdsxb6.u-strasbg.fr and Senior Consultant for Electronic Publishing American Astronomical Society -- pboyce@aas.org -- http://www.aas.org/~pboyce
- Prev by Date: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Next by Date: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Prev by thread: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Next by thread: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Index(es):