[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From Pricing To Preservation
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: From Pricing To Preservation
- From: Lois Weinstein <mlcny@metgate.metro.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:26:32 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As the Executive Director of a medical library consortium that maintains a collection of over 400,000 volumes of older journals, I am fascinated with the discussions on this listserv that seem, to me, to be mainly about cost. I wonder what you are all doing or thinking about preservation issues. In the past, I have asked many publishers, in the medical and STM fields, how far back their print journal collections go and have been very interested to learn that they usually do NOT have the older jorunals. They generally retain only the last 5 or maybe 10 years. If they are not interested in preserving their own print publications, what makes anyone think they will "preserve" the electronic materials? And if they are not going to do it, who will? I also see this growing into a much more serious problem 10 or 20 years from now when most, if not all journals, will be electronic. The maintenance of an electronic journal is probably going to cost much more than a print journal due to the changes in software and hardware that will take place. Besides OCLC, are their any non-profits or commercial companies devoted to maintaining these electronic journals in perpetuity?
- Prev by Date: Re: Science Online model and Princeton
- Next by Date: Re: Linking
- Prev by thread: Re: Linking
- Next by thread: liability clauses
- Index(es):