[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Licensing terms encountered:
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Licensing terms encountered:
- From: "Peter B. Boyce" <pboyce@aas.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 20:04:55 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David Goodman makes the point that the library community has to make choices when subscribing to new electronic journals which cost more. Leaving aside the issue of whether they should cost more, which I have already spoken about (I don't think they should cost more if they are done right), there are fundamental differences in quality of the electronic version of different journals which should enter into the decision. I am writing an article for Against the Grain which deals with this issue. In it I say the archival quality of the electronic version should be weighed heavily when makiing an assessment of whether to subscribe to an electronic journal. Some journals will be able to be maintained in their electronic form quite easily. Others only appear in formats such as PDF which are not of archival quality and will become unusable faster than newsprint will disintegrate. In my opinion the ease of maintaining the electronic archive should be investigated thoroughly before licensing an electronic journal. Not only must the journal have an underlying SGML format, but it is important to ensure that the SGML is of sufficient quality that it can be migrated forward into, say, XML when that becomes the standard. Not all SGML is of equal quality. Ask the publisher how they kow their SGML can be translated into a new standard. Then there is the question of accessibility by new versions of the browsers. Does the publisher have any plans to make this year's issues readable by the browsers which will appear in the year 2000? How do they plan to do that? Will they charge for the necessary upgrades? If the journal is produced by a modern process, it should be possible to make such upgrades almost entirely by automatic translation, which means they can be accomplished within the current operating budget of the journal. So, I recommend that librarians consider more than price and usage when making decisions about whether or not to license a given journal. _____________________________________________________ Dr. Peter B. Boyce Senior Consultant for Electronic Publishing American Astronomical Society http:www.aas.org/~pboyce pboyce@aas.org
- Prev by Date: Re: EBLIDA/ECUP/STM Joint Statement
- Next by Date: AMIGOS first U.S. Consortium to sign 'EmeraldPlus' license
- Prev by thread: AMIGOS first U.S. Consortium to sign 'EmeraldPlus' license
- Next by thread: Licensing terms encountered: one librarian's resposes
- Index(es):