[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- To: Liblicense <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 17:40:57 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <199810302229.RAA02676@gr.its.yale.edu>
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In reference to Sally Morris's first paragraph below, I'd think it should read "no digitisation can be legally carried out without the explicit permission of the **copyright owner** (not "publisher"). I would modify it further as follows, " or unless otherwise lawfully permitted." The publisher may not be the owner of the copyright; and "no digitisation" is too blanket, I would argue, an assertion. The rest of the message, which references specific broad-based library/publisher agreements or licenses that permit digitisation without explicit publisher permission each time (presuming the publisher owns the rights), is most interesting. I think many of us not in UK or Europe would like to hear more about HERON and the EBLIDA agreements, please. Ann Okerson Ann.Okerson@yale.edu _________________________________ On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Sally Morris wrote: > At present, no digitisation can be legally carried out without the > explicit permission of the publisher and any other copyright owner (who > may or may not require a fee) and under the terms specified by them. [SNIP] > Sally Morris, Secretary-General > Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers > South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK > > Phone: 01903 871686 Fax: 01903 871286 E-mail: > alpsp@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk > > -----Original Message----- > From: Koltay Klara <kkoltay@giant.lib.klte.hu> > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > Date: 29 October 1998 15:41 > Subject: copyright issues of scanned articles > > > >As librarian not much trained in copyright law , but realising the > >importance of the issue and wishing to make the most of our possibilites > >without breaking the rules and law, I would like to hear your opinion on > >the following: > > > >1. What restrictions does a library have to observe when trying to make > >use of digitisation techniques and electronic data transmission in it > >interlibrary loan transactions? What are the musts and must nots? > > > >2. In what way and with what restrictions can a library store the once > >digitized articles and book chapters in a searchable database for further > >use? Is it prohibited in itself? Can it be a resource database only to > >prevent rescanning of the same article and the damage of a fragile > >original document? Can it be an intranet database with scientific and > >educational purposes? Can it be an database used by a wider consortium of > >libraries? > > > >Thank you very much > > > >Klara Koltay > >Debrecen, Hungary > >kkoltay@giantlib.klte.hu >
- References:
- Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- From: "Sally Morris" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- Prev by Date: Change in format
- Next by Date: Re: eBook-List Discussion List
- Prev by thread: Re: copyright issues of scanned articles
- Next by thread: RE: author's rights/Uncover case
- Index(es):