[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: author's rights
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: author's rights
- From: Judy Luther <jluther@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 19:47:56 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Bernie: You raise an excellent point about author's retaining the copyright which is distinct from the issue of their work being made available in electronic form. I found Barbara Quint's article in Information Today helpful in distinguishing the two issues for me. Author's retained copyright. These are free lance authors who claim they did not grant copyright to the publisher and therefore are not being fairly compensated. I find it interesting that it was the authors who sued CARL and not the publishers who are compensated by the CCC. I am unclear as to the role of The National Writers Union author's registry and the CCC in providing an efficient mechanism to support freelance authors. Perhaps another contributor to this list can enlighten us. Retained in electronic form Efficiently storing the article in electronic form for resale once it is scanned, is a peripheral issue for CARL in this case. I believe there are legal constraints around storing (electronic) copies for commercial use. A recent case, Tasini v. NY Times, is being appealed since the courts decided that the NY Times as the publisher had the right to include the authors works in an electronic version in addition to a print version. This relates to the publisher's negotiation to produce an author's work in multiple formats. If the CARL case stands, I would expect it to impact both the publishers who negotiate authors rights and the aggregators (such as IAC and UMI) who provide article level access. Increased electronic access to the contents of journals is driving the consumption at the article level. Given the demand, I would expect that a system will be developed, adapted or expanded to efficiently handle authors' compensation. The question is - what happens while this is being resolved. Judy Judy Luther, MLS, MBA Informed Strategies 610-645-7546 tel 102 West Montgomery Ave. #B 610-645-5251 fax Ardmore PA 19003 jluther@earthlink.net -----Original Message----- From: Sloan, Bernie [SMTP:bernies@uillinois.edu] Sent: Friday, October 23, 1998 3:25 PM To: 'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu' Subject: Just out of curiousity, what, if any, implications does a case like this have for other methods of "reselling" journal articles electronically? I realize that what UnCover does is different from what an IAC or a UMI offers via their full text article databases, or what individual publishers do when they offer electronic versions of their journals. I am just curious about the potential impacts of "authors rights" issues on the electronic packaging and re-packaging of journal articles. Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: E-journals in the era of print cancellations
- Next by Date: WebBooks: Identification, Acquisition and Management
- Prev by thread: WebBooks: Identification, Acquisition and Management
- Next by thread: American Scientist article
- Index(es):