[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: print costs vs. electronic costs
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: print costs vs. electronic costs
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 22:40:07 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Shirley Lambert writes: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:57:12 -0500 From: shirley_lambert@nbnbooks.com To: ann.okerson@yale.edu, boyce@newb6.u-strasbg.fr Subject: print costs vs. electronic costs Dear Mr. Boyce: In response to your recent message about saving print costs by producing a robust electronic version of the journal first, I would like to point out that a certain amount of cost is incurred in the editing process. From there a corrected disk can be "poured" into the correct format for a printed page. This step is not necessary in producing electronic copy because of the tagging. But the tagging doesn't produce the printed format (columns and so forth). Therefore, I do beg to differ with your assessment of what costs "ought" to be. Shirley Lambert Editorial Director, Scarecrow Press 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 slambert@nbnbooks.com
- Prev by Date: Cost of Journals
- Next by Date: RE: EB online
- Prev by thread: Library liability and Net access
- Next by thread: Cost of Journals
- Index(es):