[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A thought about S. 2037--anticircumvention & fair use
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: A thought about S. 2037--anticircumvention & fair use
- From: David_Mirchin@silverplatter.com
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 20:08:02 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hello, The Senate Committee report of May 11, 1998 to accompany The Digital Millenium Copyright Act, S. 2037 (the law which implements the WIPO copyright treaty) states as follows: "The bill does not amend section 107 of the Copyright Act, the fair use provision. The Committee determined that no change to section 107 was required because section 107, as written, is technologically neutral, and therefore, the fair use doctrine is fully applicable in the digital world as in the analog world." Based on that, wouldn't it be highly unlikely from a practical perspective, that a prosecutor would bring a case against someone who circumvented copyright protection mechanisms to make fair use of copyrighted material? In any event, would a better solution be to explicitly state that a defense to liability under the anti-circumvention provisions be that "I was making fair use"? David Mirchin VP & General Counsel SilverPlatter Information, Inc. davidm@silverplatter.com tel: 781-769-2599, ext. 235
- Prev by Date: RE: A thought about H.R. 2281 - Anti circumvention
- Next by Date: Elsevier's EJournal ILL Policy Changes
- Prev by thread: Elsevier's EJournal ILL Policy Changes
- Next by thread: RE: A thought about S. 2037--anticircumvention & fair use
- Index(es):