Previous by Date |
Index by Date
Threaded Index |
Next by Date |
---|---|---|
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread |
Re: COPYRIGHT ISSUES: Database Legislation is Reasonable, and Deserves Support
Hello, And now, into the Lion's Den! I want to share a different viewpoint about the Collections of Information Antipiracy Act, HR 2652. I support this bill; I believe it will go a long way toward ensuring that good quality, reliable factual databases continue to be produced. This means that researchers and businesses will benefit from these databases. Right now, there is a problem. Factual databases are used all the time for research in universities and medical schools, and for businesses. Examples include: PoisIndex, which is a listing of over a million harmful substances and the antidotes and treatment for these toxic substances. Poison control centers throughout the world use this as their bible. Or Peterson's College Guide, which contains information on 3500 universities in North America. Peterson's also does guides to Graduate Schools, and other educational institutions. Or, closest to home, the American Library Directory, which contains information on 36,000 libraries in North America. What all these directories have in common is that they are collections of facts. And this means that copyright law doesn't protect them, which only protects original creative works. So the result is that the producers of these databases have had their work ripped off. This isn't just theoretical, but has happened to organizations. A notorious recent example was Warren Publishing. They publish the Cable & Television Factbook. A competitor to be copied the entire book, and published it. Warren Publishing sued, but lost. The court said that the material wasn't copyrightable, and therefore Warren couldn't prevent someone from copying it. There is something very inequitable in the current situation. And if ripping off these databases becomes more common, it is very reasonable to think that pubishers will simply choose not to invest their effort and resources into updating and verifying the information in these databases. And the loser will be the users, who won't have these databases to rely on any more. The Antipiracy Act, which passed the House last week, was a reasonable effort to protect these creations. If the copying erodes the market for the products, there is a claim that the publisher can bring. There are safe harbors for researchers and not-for-profit institutions. All in all, a reasonable compromise to address an unhealthy and unfair siutation. . David Mirchin Vice President & General Counsel SilverPlatter Information, Inc.
http://www.library.yale.edu/liblicense © 1996, 1997 Yale University Library |
Please read our Disclaimer E-mail us with feedback |