Previous by Date Index by Date
Threaded Index 		Next by Date
Previous by Thread Next by Thread


Re: Ads in online journals, was: Re: CBC and Liblicense list 

I agree with Ann's concerns.  By subscribing to the product we may be
implicitly endorsing the products being advertised.  If the cost of
aggregation and distribution are covered by advertising we should not have
to pay anything.  In that case, we would add a disclaimer stating that we
do not endorse the products.  Miriam Drake

At 10:31 PM 4/8/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Co-incidentally, let me report briefly on a recent development.  A large
>aggregator of diverse information/news sources has just made an offer to a
>group of consortia that involves keeping the price of the aggregated
>resource at a lower (rather than far higher) level by including
>advertising.  The advertising will be aimed (as is the product use) at
>students, generally undergraduates.  The advertising will be
>"click-through" so that the user of the database can look at sites of
>interest to him or her.  The advertising will not include alcohol, drugs,
>firearms, and other controversial products and the aggregator is willing
>to work with a librarian advisory group to make sure that the advertising
>chosen is not problematic or offensive. 
>
>When this offer was presented, we were all delighted at the possibility
>of price stabilization.  We were variously concerned, however, about such
>advertising for reasons such as:
>
>o Implied endorsement by the institution of the product being advertised.
>o Tying up limited resources (such as library workstations) for longer
>times, while students head for the Reebok, Coca Cola, United Airlines
>Vacations, and Ferrari sites.
>
>If/when this advertising is implemented, it will be a first for our own
>licensed electronic information resources -- ones for which we pay
>substantial sums of money.
>
>I would be interested in hearing of readers' reactions to this
>development, which I am sure only presages much more of the same.
>
>Ann Okerson
>Yale University Library
>Ann.Okerson@yale.edu
>
>_______________________
>
>> I too have never understood this position of some of the publishers.
>> Clearly, a great many companies do think such ads work, as a startlingly
>> large amount of money seems to be being invested in the infrastructure and
>> production of them! As a user, yes, I will read them only if interested,
>> but isn't that the idea?  If I were an advertiser, I imagine I would be
>> very aware of the electronic medium's potential for measuring actual
>> readership-- not just of the publication but the ad itself.  This is not
>> possible in print, though I know it is attempted with survey techniques. 
>> We are presumably seeing another instance of the maladaptive conservatism
>> of the publishing industry. If they remain conservative to the point of
>> fossilization, we will all lose the benefits we might get from their
>> further evolution.
>> 
>> David Goodman 
>> Biology Librarian, Princeton University Library 
>> dgoodman@princeton.edu         http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/
>> phone: 609-258-3235            fax: 609-258-2627
>
>
>


http://www.library.yale.edu/liblicense
© 1996, 1997 Yale University Library
 Please read our Disclaimer
E-mail us with feedback