Previous by Date |
Index by Date
Threaded Index |
Next by Date |
---|---|---|
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread |
information sharing
Ann's posting about information providers wanting to know searches and clicks brings to mind a news story today that others will have heard: CVS and Giant pharmacies have acknowledged that they have been selling data about patient prescription records to marketers to facilitate targeted drug advertising. "Dear Sir, Are you happy with how your anti-depressant is working? Have you talked to your doctor about Cheerzac?" When called on it (here's the only good news in this) the pharmacies said they'd stop. I fear we live in a world in which we will have to assume that everything about us is known, but it's well worth the fight for the professionals who know the most personal things about us (medical, legal, and libraries come to mind) AND FROM WHOM WE DON'T SIMPLY BUY COMMODITIES to be called on to a higher standard. (I mean that if I buy groceries, I guess I now expect them to track my purchases and to print out coupons that I'm likely to use. Not sure I like it, but I feel less outraged. But what I've done in a medical clinic or a library feels like a much more personal and private kind of transaction.) Jim O'Donnell Classics, U. of Penn jod@ccat.sas.upenn.edu
http://www.library.yale.edu/liblicense © 1996, 1997 Yale University Library |
Please read our Disclaimer E-mail us with feedback |