[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:42:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
To what Rick says (with which I largely agree) I would add that the distribution of single articles in a non-systematic way could be justified as "fair use" or under the provisions of Sec. 108--which means that the publisher would receive no income at all! So, if a sociologist, say, wanted only an occasional article from the American Journal of Sociology, he or she could obtain if via interlibrary "loan" or from a colleague who has a subscription. This kind of patron-driven access model would leave the publisher with a significantly reduced income stream to support publication of the journal. That is another reason that should motivate publishers to move in the direction of Gold OA. Sandy Thatcher
- Prev by Date: RE: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Next by Date: Re: Hathi Orphans?
- Previous by thread: RE: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Next by thread: Re: Future of the "subscription model?"
- Index(es):