[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hathi Orphans
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Hathi Orphans
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:16:06 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What this article makes me wonder is, did the HathiTrust ever consider asking a publisher, like the University of Michigan Press, about the procedures it follows for determining whether a copyright work is an orphan or not? This is a problem publishers have long been accustomed to grappling with, and they have worked out good procedures for resolving the question. Libraries have not had much reason in the past to worry about the orphan status of works in their collections, I assume, so this is a new challenge for them. My guess is that a publisher would not have made the same kinds of mistakes that HathiTrust evidently made with some of its determinations, as embarrassingly revealed by the Authors Guild. Sandy Thatcher >Of interest from the Chronicle of Higher Education > >*** > >HathiTrust Acknowledges Flaws in Handling 'Orphan Works' > >September 16, 2011, 2:04 pm
- Prev by Date: Wiley Job Network Launched
- Next by Date: Re: "No Authors Have Been Harmed in the Making of This Library"
- Previous by thread: Re: Hathi Orphans
- Next by thread: RE: Hathi Orphans
- Index(es):