[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Librarians who pay for nothing (Re: Economics of Green OA)
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Librarians who pay for nothing (Re: Economics of Green OA)
- From: Oya Yildirim Rieger <oyr1@cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:19:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Colleagues - Sandy's point about the role of endowments in long-term sustainability of online academic resources is well taken. At Cornell, we've considered this option for arXiv (and continue to explore it); however, not as a sole source of income. Business plans need to be diversified to avoid a single point of failure. SEP is certainly an inspiring case. In their ISQ article, Edward Zalta and Uri Nodelman eloquently describe both the potential and limitations of the endowments approach: http://www.niso.org/publications/isq/free/OP_Zalta_Nodelman_Stanford_isqv22no4.pdf SEP's annual budget is $200,000/year whereas arXiv is a more complicated and evolving operation with an annual budget of approximately $500,000. So if arXiv were to rely on endowment payouts, it would require an endowment of $10+ million. Our goal for ensuring the long-term stability (and of course growth and innovation) for arXiv is building a diverse financial portfolio that combines contributions from libraries, research centers, foundations, and initiatives such as SCOAP3 - blended with endowment income. Stewardship of open access academic resources such as arXiv involves not only covering the operational costs but also continuing to enhance their value based on the needs of the user community and the evolving patterns and modes of scholarly communication. An integral part of our business planning process is assessing the technologies, standards, services, policies and communities that constitute arXiv and determining a research and innovation agenda to advance the service. We will continue to write grants and engage in collaborations to secure funds that will support research and development work as well as growing specific subject domains (such as mathematics). We believe that open access services such as arXiv must have clearly defined mandates and associated governance structures to reflect a commitment to the long-term stewardship of a service. Establishing a transparent and participatory governance structure will thus be a critical factor in generating institutional fees as well as formulating a diverse financial strategy. During the last several months, we reviewed a range of potential legal status options to establish a community-based support and governance structure and appropriate procedures for strategic, operational, and fiscal oversight. We continue our planning work and hope to share more information on this front in a couple of months. Best regards, Oya Oya Y. Rieger, Ph.D. Associate University Librarian Digital Scholarship Services Cornell University Library http://vivo.cornell.edu/individual/vivo/individual23129
- Prev by Date: Re: Librarians who pay for nothing (Re: Economics of Green OA)
- Next by Date: Court ruling could undermine libraries' lending of foreign books
- Previous by thread: Re: Librarians who pay for nothing (Re: Economics of Green OA)
- Next by thread: Re: Librarians who pay for nothing (Re: Economics of Green OA)
- Index(es):