[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Amazon boycott
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Amazon boycott
- From: John Buschman <jeb224@Georgetown.edu>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:56:48 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
That Amazon contracts to have delivered items it sells means that it does, in fact, use the infrastructure of any given state to deliver the items. I think as another post put it, to simply jump to the level saying this is tantamount to a boycott of the internet is a little polemical. Not collecting taxes on online sales is a direct benefit and subsidy to them. The items get delivered - whether by a truck to a store, or by trucks to homes. The roads, the fuel, the emissions, the sidewalks, the stoplights, police, and on all use the same infrastructure, it is simply that Amazon enjoys an unfair tax advantage. I don't particularly like the side benefit to Walmart that comes with this, but the playing fields (such as they are) are tilted here. John Buschman
- Prev by Date: RE: Amazon boycott
- Next by Date: Economics of Green Open Access
- Previous by thread: RE: Amazon boycott
- Next by thread: Re: Amazon boycott
- Index(es):