[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reed Elsevier results
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Reed Elsevier results
- From: Ken Masters <kmasters@ithealthed.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 22:45:33 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hi All Increased profits from commercial publishers do not in any way negate a statement that OA has massive growth. There could be many reasons that Reed Elsevier has increased its profits. Reducing costs is one way to increase profits (This is discussed in the article). Increasing prices of publications and big deal contracts is another. This does not appear to be mentioned in the article, but those of you who deal with library budgets can comment on that. Still it's nice to know that, in the midst of a world financial crisis (where education institutions and libraries are being forced to lay off staff, cut services, reduce operating hours, etc., because of massive financial cuts) companies that supply publications to those same institutions are able to make such impressive profits from those institutions. I'm sure many librarians sleep more easily at night knowing this. Regards Ken Dr. Ken Masters Asst. Professor: Medical Informatics Medical Education Unit College of Medicine & Health Sciences Sultan Qaboos University Sultanate of Oman On 29 July 2011 01:43, Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is a financial analysis of Reed Elsevier's recent > performance: > > > http://www.stockmarketwire.com/article/4191921/Reed-Elsevier-improves-as-margins-grow.html > > The results are good. Specifically cited in the report is the > strength in subscription revenues. > > Although this list regularly receives missives about "the > dramatic growth of open access" and the death of the Big Deal, > when you actually look at the facts, the environment seems mostly > unchanged. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Essay on copying
- Next by Date: CLOCKSS announces new publishers: BIR, ERS, AAPL, and Inderscience
- Previous by thread: Essay on copying
- Next by thread: Re: Reed Elsevier results
- Index(es):