[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Loyalty fee - clarification of the model used
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Loyalty fee - clarification of the model used
- From: Selma Aslan <selmaslan@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:38:57 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Thanks for the interest shown in this topic. It apparently needs clarification. In the model currently used each consortium member pays for own subscriptions as content fee and access fee is at a higher level for members without any subscriptions and lower for members with subscriptions. Each year access fee is increased as a result of negotiations. Depending on entrance year, the share of x percent increase in access fee reflects in each member's share at different values. When shares are tested based on FTE, usage, budget, it is seen that the variations have become somehow excessive over the years. On the other hand members with high subscriptions expect more contribution from members without holdings. A new model will be developed for adjustment. That is why I queried this point. Many thanks for contributions. Selma
- Prev by Date: Challenging the Access Crisis
- Next by Date: "Libraries Abandon Expensive 'Big Deal' Packages
- Previous by thread: Challenging the Access Crisis
- Next by thread: "Libraries Abandon Expensive 'Big Deal' Packages
- Index(es):