[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Footnote to GSU discussion
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Footnote to GSU discussion
- From: Winston Tabb <wtabb@jhu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:07:58 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sorry, but librarians also know very well how complicated copyright comploiance is. There is no need gratutiously to "advantage" publishers in thisd debate And why did Cornell capitulate in the first place? Risk-averse administration? ----- Original Message ----- From: Joseph Esposito [mailto:espositoj@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 04:50 PM To: Liblicense-L@Lists. Yale. Edu <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Subject: Footnote to GSU discussion I am not going to wade in further on the GSU debate itself, but wish to add this footnote. No one knows better than publishers themselves how complicated copyright compliance is. This is because publishers have to clear copyright permissions all the time, not only with a work's primary author (obviously) but also with the copyright holders (or alleged holders) of the embedded material in so many works, all those pesky photos and drawings and charts. My first full-time job in publishing was to handle rights and permissions at Rutgers University Press. There were some authors who were diligent about clearing permissions (they went about it with the rigor of a scholar), some who were careless. The administrative time that went into managing this process was way out of proportion to the apparent economic benefits of strict compliance and enforcement. Now of course things are changing. Electronic databases are gradually making it easier to identify reuse of material (as students asked to use the TurnItIn service can attest). This will change how we think about copyright, not just because the Internet is one huge "copying machine," as some have called it, but also because the Internet is one big generator of user logs and other sometimes disturbing forms of control. For better or worse, the argument that it is burdensome to comply with copyright requirements is going to slowly go away. I am myself most interested in that future state: what will be the place of copyright (if any) when everything is digital, everything transparent to a highly motivated spider? The corollary to this is, what systems, procedures, and businesses will arise that are native to that environment? Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey Report Available
- Next by Date: Genes|Genoes|Genetics, a new, open-access journal
- Previous by thread: Footnote to GSU discussion
- Next by thread: COAR Latin America - CLARA, COLABORA and COAR join forces
- Index(es):