[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Measuring citations
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Measuring citations
- From: "Woodward, Hazel" <hazel.woodward@cranfield.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:06:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Readers of the list may be interested to know that the Journal Usage Factor (JUF) Project, sponsored by UKSG, RIN and a number of publishers, is investigating the feasibility of developing and implementing a sustainable, statistically robust, usage-based measure of the impact of journals. The latest phase of this project, a detailed statistical analysis of the usage of 150,000 articles from over 300 COUNTER-compliant journals across five broad subject fields, has just been completed and the results are very promising indeed. The report of this phase of the JUF project will be published in early July on the COUNTER and UKSG websites (www.projectCOUNTER.org) and (www.uksg.org), where background information on the project may already be found. Among the recommendations contained in the report will be a proposed methodology for calculating the JUF. The project has also addressed likely gaming scenarios and make proposals for dealing with these. Hazel -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Anthony Watkinson Sent: 15 June 2011 23:36 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Measuring citations I would like to make two comments on this topic. I entirely agree that the work of Bollen and his colleagues is excellent and any presentations from the work worth reading. No-one that I know of thinks that the use of the impact factor for a journal is the best way to judge the true impact of an article in a journal (whatever true impact means). However the impact factor (used in this way) seems to reign supreme and as far as the journal is concerned it is not some conspiracy among publishers that results in the huge pressure to increase or maintain the impact factor for the journals they are responsible for. The pressure comes from the community. The publisher is under pressure (manifested at any editorial board meeting or interaction with a society partner) to do everything they can to improve the IF. Such pressure can certainly (in my experience) get in the way of taking measures to develop the journal so it best serves the longer term interest of the journal as appropriately serving the community in question and the progress of knowledge. Of course the publisher wants to either boast or keep quiet about the journal and its IF - see any journal site. The second point I want to make is that I think Joe is wrong in implying that publishers invest in copy-editing with the intention to improve impact factors. I have looked back at the blog-posting by Phil and I do not think he says that and certainly his source did not suggest it. I assume it is an assumption by Joe. I have checked with friends in the industry I am no longer part of and it is a new idea for them. Automated reference checking systems in which they have for some years considerable investment has been made are invested in to facilitate linking so it is usually some other journal that gets the advantage. I suppose you could say that the whole of CrossRef is a conspiracy of publishers (as I know some people do) but I would suggest that the massive impact of linking properly was intended to benefit the academic community. Of course the side affect was to make most references at the end the article accurate. In the "old days" I recall that at least 20% of references were incorrect in spite of some journals using intensive manual checking even to the extent of visiting libraries! Anthony -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu On Behalf Of Aline Soules Sent: 15 June 2011 00:37 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Measuring citations Lately, there have been several attempts to clarify the true impact of journals. MESUR is one such important effort (http://www.mesur.org/MESUR.html). Johan Bollen spoke about this project at a NISO/BISG meeting at ALA a couple of years ago. I recommend this effort as worth your consideration. Aline Soules California State University, East Bay Hayward, CA 94542 aline.soules@csueastbay.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Another post about the Georgia State copyright case
- Next by Date: Re: Another post about the Georgia State copyright case
- Previous by thread: Re: Measuring citations
- Next by thread: RE: Measuring citations
- Index(es):