[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: non-negotiation license question
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: non-negotiation license question
- From: "Scott Stangroom" <stangroom@library.umass.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:20:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We have not at UMass Amherst. I think you should cancel and I also think you should tell us who the publisher is - we should not let these people bully us the way they try to do. ~Scott ______________________ Scott Stangroom Acquisitions Coordinator University of Massachusetts, Amherst W.E.B. Du Bois Library Acquisitions Dept. Amherst, MA 01003-9275 stangroom@library.umass.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Matthew Person Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 9:20 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: non-negotiation license question A major publisher from whom we purchase 15% worth of our serials has told us that our single non-serial purchase from them will be covered by a new non-negotiation policy license which will only require our signature. This "non-negotiation" license is indeed the publisher's standard license. The license itself references nothing having to do with "non-negotiation" The publisher won't answer questions about their policy, so we find ourselves considering cancellation of this valuable resource, because of such low quality customer support and awareness. Has anyone recently encountered any similar situation? Thanks, Matt Person Matthew Person Technical Services Coordinator MBLWHOI Library MBL Center for Library and Informatics
- Prev by Date: ALCTS Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management course:
- Next by Date: RE: non-negotiation license question
- Previous by thread: non-negotiation license question
- Next by thread: RE: non-negotiation license question
- Index(es):