[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libraries and dissertations
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Libraries and dissertations
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:38:02 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Weren't you picking on publishers, Joe, by saying its their "responsibility to rectify the situation" by doing more marketing? I was trying to point out that everyone shares some of the blame here, by each party being focused so intently on their own immediate self-interest that the larger problem gets swept under the rug and no one feels any responsibility for solving it. if we can all agree that 1) there is value in revised dissertations above and beyond the dissertations on which they are based and (2) junior faculty need to publish them to advance in their careers, then we collectively need to look for solutions and involve others, like administrators, to make changes that are beyond the limited powers of each of our sectors to accomplish separately. Sandy Thatcher >Sandy, > >I am not missing the "main" problem here. I know very well what >the problem is. My point was simply that we shouldn't pick on >librarians. If the dysfunction is systemic, then we shouldn't be >blaming librarians or anyone else. > >Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: open access to dissertations
- Next by Date: Re: open access to dissertations
- Previous by thread: Re: Libraries and dissertations
- Next by thread: Frontline GMS and Ringgold launch unique consortium resource
- Index(es):