[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Business models for U. presses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Business models for U. presses
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:16:31 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I share Joe's assessment of this report, which is one of the best ever issued by the AAUP. Among its valuable contributions are its clarification of the kinds of "value added" that publishers bring to the scholarly communication process (still not well understood by many librarians, as comments on this and other listservs have revealed), its analysis of how the OA approaches of two non-profit presses at RAND and the National Academies are unqie in ways that make their direct application at most university presses problematic or at least not straightforward, and the emphasis on the need for greater collaboration than ever among all the participants in the scholarly communication ecosystem if the system is to survive and flourish in the future. Also, if you ever harbored the illusion that e-publishing is a whole lot cheaper than print publishing, this report will be a wakeup call for you! Sandy Thatcher >The AAUP has just released a report on business models on >university presses. It is a very good report, which I recommend >to everyone involved with scholarly communications. The report >can be found here: > >http://bit.ly/e89vfe > >I commented on it at the Kitchen here: > >http://bit.ly/gyKL9z > >And an article on the report by Jennifer Howard appears here: > >http://bit.ly/fV0pNR > >Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: ALPSP Effective Journals Marketing, London, 2nd June 2011
- Next by Date: Springer license chuckle
- Previous by thread: Business models for U. presses
- Next by thread: RE: Business models for U. presses
- Index(es):