[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- From: Philip Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:48:02 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Heather, As a doctoral student, you may do well to read deeply into the sociology of science, for it is there that you will find answers to the questions that seem to befuddle you. Specifically, you will find the concept of *social stratification* which explains how scientific authors are concentrated at research universities along with the resources (equipment, grants, trained peers, graduate students) and world-class research libraries required to service them. It makes a lot of sense and explains the lack of a citation (but not readership) effect reported in the rigorous studies. -Phil Davis Heather Morrison wrote: > My comment: the empirical research findings are supported by > logic. Indeed, one might argue that this research, which welcome > and useful, should not be necessary. It just makes sense that if > a scholar makes their work more widely available, more people > will read it (including scholars) and cite it.
- Prev by Date: Problematic license: Informa Healthcare
- Next by Date: APS to Adopt Creative Commons Licensing
- Previous by thread: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- Next by thread: Re: Open Access Citation Impact Advantage: weight of the evidence
- Index(es):