[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- From: <Toby.GREEN@oecd.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:56:17 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Couple of reactions: smaller journal publishers can swim together with the ALPSP Journal Collection - a mini-big (and not-for-profit) deal; secondly, monograph publishers should (and could) have reacted sooner to the realities of the way libraries spend their money. It's no use complaining that libraries chose to switch their spending away from monographs to journals and then electronic information services (which is really what the big deals are), the thing to do is to react and come up with a compelling business model that librarians will respond to. As I've said before, it is possible for monographs to be bundled into big deals that offer as much value as e-journal collections, it's something we've been doing for a decade and librarians have responded - our sales (and dissemination) have grown year-on-year since 2001. Other book publishers have done the same (e.g. OUP, World Bank) - the key is to offer compelling value. Monograph bundles will work if the value is there -! All it takes is for the smaller publishers to get together, start bundling and offer better value than the big boys! Toby Green Head of Publishing, OECD Chair, ALPSP ----- Original Message ----- From: Sandy Thatcher [mailto:sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu] Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 03:22 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>; Subject: Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank Maybe for the big publishers and maybe for some libraries, but certainly not for all the smaller journal publishers whose journals get dropped because the Big Deals cost so much, not to mention the publishers of monographs whose sales have flatlined for years because of STM journal subscription costs. And how does that make this the best invention for scholarship overall? Sandy Thatcher At 8:25 PM -0500 1/19/11, Syun Tutiya wrote: >Dear Sandy and Warren, > >Warren says: > >> I tend not to respond to set ups like this for fear that I will >> get inundated with responses that I do not have the time or >> inclination to deal with. So with that caveat, I will tell you >> that I am a librarian who has been involved with the licensing >> of e-resources for over 14 years and I agree with Derk Haank. > >I am not a genuine librarian, but have been involved in e-journal >etc licensing negotiations since 1999, in the other side of your >world in the geographical and perhaps in the historical sense. >I agree with Warren, who agrees with Derk Haank. The Big Deal is >the best invention as we can imagine. > >Best, > >Syun >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Syun Tutiya >Professor of Cognitive and Information Sciences, Chiba University >Address: Faculty of Letters, Chiba University >Email: tutiya @ kenon.l.chiba-u.ac.jp
- Prev by Date: The long, wrong road to Open Access
- Next by Date: FW: Author Copyright Issue (SLEEP)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- Next by thread: RE: Interview with Springer's Derk Haank
- Index(es):