[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Derivative works?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Derivative works?
- From: "Hamaker, Charles" <cahamake@uncc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:30:54 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sandy Thatcher said:"If the contract had said that "no fair use can be made from the content," you would not want to sign any such contract!" I'd say the majority of contracts I see right now attempt to limit rights of use to those enumerated in the contract, in effect gutting fair use or trumping it through contract language. I always try to get in that fair use is one of accepted uses, but many contracts start by assuming fair use is out of the question and you have to add it back in. Having failed at getting fair use out of the public sphere through copyright legislation and court cases, many publishers are trying to limit use by contract language. Chuck Hamaker
- Prev by Date: Re: Author Copyright Issue (SLEEP)
- Next by Date: RE: Derivative works?
- Previous by thread: Re: Derivative works?
- Next by thread: RE: Derivative works?
- Index(es):