[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Terms subject to change
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Terms subject to change
- From: Linda Wobbe <lwobbe@stmarys-ca.edu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:46:14 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hi Derrik, I've seen similar terms. I would try again to have notification of all changes (so you get to decide whether it is material or not). Also, I'd try to get a pro-rated refund for terminations regardless of cause (including if you find changed terms objectionable). ...Linda Linda Wobbe/ Head, Collection Management/ Saint Mary's College Library/ PO Box 4290/ 1928 Saint Mary's Road/ Moraga, CA 94575-4290/ ph(925)631-4232; fx(925)376-6097 On 12/17/10 3:26 PM, Hiatt, Derrik wrote: > Seeking the collective wisdom ... > > We are working on a license agreement with a large vendor (you > would all recognize the name). Their default license includes > the following language: > > "[Licensor] reserves the right to modify these Terms and > Conditions, or any aspect of [licensed materials], at any time. > The most updated Terms and Conditions of Use will be posted on > the [licensor's] website. [Licensor] shall notify Institutional > Licensees via email of material modifications. A modification > shall become effective for an Institutional Licensee if it does > not object in writing to [licensor] within 60 (sixty) days from > the time [licensor] emails notice of the modification. In the > event of such an objection, the Institutional Licensee shall have > the right to terminate the Agreement on 30 (thirty) days written > notice." > > I asked the licensor to change the one-sided right to > modification with a statement that the signed Agreement should > prevail, and that "Any amendments to the Agreement must be in > writing and signed by both [licensor] and the Institutional > Licensee." They refused to change the default language. > > Are any of you accepting language like this, where a licensor has > the right to change the terms unilaterally, and the licensee's > only recourse is to accept or cancel? Seems to me that a > contract that can be modified at will by one party isn't much of > a contract. > > Any advice how to approach would be appreciated. > > Thank you, > > C. Derrik Hiatt > Electronic Resources Librarian > Z. Smith Reynolds Library > Wake Forest University > Winston-Salem, NC 27109
- Prev by Date: RE: Terms subject to change
- Next by Date: RE: Terms subject to change
- Previous by thread: RE: Terms subject to change
- Next by thread: RE: Terms subject to change
- Index(es):