[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: digital Beatles -- the mother of all licensing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: digital Beatles -- the mother of all licensing
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:29:29 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The music companies may not have taken on YouTube but the movie companies have, in Viacom vs. YouTube: http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/23/business/la-fi-ct-viacom-20100623. Though the initial decision went against Viacom, it is on appeal, and I would bet that RIAA will be among the amici filing briefs in support of Viacom, as the publishing industry is. Sandy Thatcher At 4:46 PM -0500 11/17/10, Ken Masters wrote: >Hi Sandy > >The legality is an entirely different issue - for the most part, >the music companies have made noises about Youtube, and have then >backed off. There may be several reasons for this, including the >possibility that the artists get a share of the advertising >revenue earned by Youtube. In addition, they don't seem to be >upset by people doing things like miming themselves to the music, >or creating their own videos based on the music. (The music, >however, is the original, and can be extracted). When they have >objected, the videos have been removed. > >Someone like Lady Gaga (hate the music, but you have to admire >they way she's figured out the advertising), knows that it's >exposure, and it gets people to her live concerts. (Where she >also allows, even encourages, the audience to video from their >cell-phones). > >As for the peer-to-peer networks like the one mentioned in the >article. Well, I steered clear of mentioning those because it's >simply impossible to measure how much downloading happens through >those (it's even impossible to try to work out how many of those >sites exist, because they can come and go at a whim.) Those who >get caught are usually those that blunder into sites like those >without knowing about VPNs, encryption, etc, and then brag openly >about doing it. > >As a side note - I'm certainly not promoting the illegal >distribution of music, or any other material - I'm merely >commenting on practices. > >Regards > >Ken > >---- > >Dr. Ken Masters >Asst. Professor: Medical Informatics >Medical Education Unit >College of Medicine & Health Sciences >Sultan Qaboos University >Sultanate of Oman >E-i-C: The Internet Journal of Medical Education
- Prev by Date: Register Today for the SSP Webinar: International Market Updates -=
- Next by Date: Re: Blog post
- Previous by thread: RE: digital Beatles -- the mother of all licensing
- Next by thread: Problem with Access to Wiley Online Library via Athens Resolved
- Index(es):