[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 11th Amendment (Re: Essay by Rick Anderson)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: 11th Amendment (Re: Essay by Rick Anderson)
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:56:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In a private message, Eric Massant reminded me that injunctive relief against the culpable state officials was still possible despite the 11th Amendment. I replied as follows: At 5:41 PM -0500 9/1/10, Sandy Thatcher wrote: >Yes, I realize that, which is why I specifically said "suit for >damages" in my posting. But when the discussion of this loophole was >going on within AAP, everyone agreed that injunctive relief was not >much of a deterrent, and that publishers would go crazy chasing down >every individual state official who might have crossed the line. The >embarrassment factor is a much more potent weapon here, i >think--although it didn't prevent the University of California from >copying software: BV Engineering vs. UCLA (1988). As Ken Crews >summarized it: > >"In one notable case, a software producer sued UCLA, alleging >infringement of it copyrighted programs. The federal district court >dismissed the case against UCLA; the state university could not be >held liable in federal court. The Court of Appeals affirmed that >decision, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case. The >immunity of UCLA and other state institutions was established. So, maybe even Phil Davis couldn't embarrass some universities enough! :) Sandy Thatcher At 5:16 PM -0400 9/1/10, Rick Anderson wrote: > > if yours is a university press attached to a state institution, >> the 11th Amendment's provision for immunity allows your press >> to republish anything published by a private publisher (whether >> a university press at a private university or any commercial >> publisher) and pricing it in any way you want without exposing >> you to a suit for damages for copyright infringement. > >Thanks to Sandy for pointing this out. Of course, the universe >has provided something of a failsafe to prevent this kind of >publishing behavior, in the form of Phil Davis -- if any >state-subsidized UP were to try repackaging and republishing >another publisher's content, Phil would be all over it before the >print could dry. (As he should be.) > >Rick Anderson >Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections >Marriott Library >Univ. of Utah >rick.anderson@utah.edu -- Sanford G. Thatcher 8201 Edgewater Drive Frisco, TX 75034-5514 e-mail: sandy.thatcher@alumni.princeton.edu Phone: (214) 705-1939 "If a book is worth reading, it is worth buying."-John Ruskin (1865) "The reason why so few good books are written is that so few people who can write know anything."-Walter Bagehot (1853)
- Prev by Date: Re: Web publishing in China
- Next by Date: Ebooks: Libraries at the Tipping Point
- Previous by thread: 11th Amendment (Re: Essay by Rick Anderson)
- Next by thread: IMU issues "Best Practices" for running journals
- Index(es):