[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- From: <Toby.GREEN@oecd.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:26:30 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Nearly 30 years ago when I started out in publishing I spent nine months as a book sales rep for Academic Press in England, "subbing" books to bookshops. I always wondered why we used this jargon rather than "repping" or simply "selling". Now I know why! And, of course, today, you can still find dummies on display at the Frankfurt Bookfair as trade publishers test ideas among the rights community. Thanks, Sandy, for the history lesson, Toby Green ----- Original Message ----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Thu Aug 19 05:13:52 2010 Subject: Re: ebook acquisition collectives I'd like to respond to this by suggesting that we may be on a path "back to the future." As I was contemplating Eric's proposal, it occurred to me that we once had a system in place in England whereby books were only published once there was a market known to exist for them. Since my own knowledge of this system is sketchy, I called upon a true book historian, Jim West at Penn State, to provide the details, which he has generously done, as follows: [snip]
- Prev by Date: RE: Article in Wired
- Next by Date: Rice U. Press
- Previous by thread: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Next by thread: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Index(es):