[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- From: Eric Hellman <eric@hellman.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:09:58 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The notes from Sandy, Joe and Todd were outstanding examples of the excellence of this list. Thanks! First, I should point everyone to the talk given by Frances Pinter at Tools of Change in February: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3ca42Io0f8&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=C1BD412D581098AF She proposed the formation of an "International Library Coalition for Open Books" which is pretty close to what I was thinking of. I'm told she is presenting at Charleston this November; Katina was listening, Sandy! I'm a pretty strong believer in markets. I imagine a library collective as creating a more efficient market for assets which are current deployed awkwardly. Publishers would be free to offer any property at any price so long as it offered appropriately open ebook access. The library collective would weigh the price and quality of each asset before deciding, using automated systems, which ones to collectively acquire. Building internet-based electronic markets is a technology that is reasonably well understood; librarians are familiar with automated purchasing systems and even with collaborative selection. To address one of Sandy's points, I don't think it too hard to put an expiration date on an publisher's offer- we've all heard of eBay. I appreciate the clarity which which Joe presented the book-as-asset viewpoint. I'm surprised that he thinks publishers would be so unbusinesslike about their assets, though. I would have thought most publishers are more interested in the production and launch of books than in servicing them. From a business point of view, books are like the loans made by banks. You put out money up front, and then let the cash flow in over many years. The banking industry is far advanced from that. The banks that originate the loans don't service them any more, they sell off the loans so they can make new loans. And, no that's not what led to the banking crisis. Publishers of all stripes should likewise be willing to cash in their book assets and use the proceeds to produce new ones. Todd, your point that non-profit publishers have costs, not prices, is true when averaged over catalogs. but even non-profit publishers have winners and losers that cost about the same to produce. Winners subsidize the losers. You wouldn't sell your winners at the same aggregate price you'd sell your losers. Sandy's comments about managing print inventory brings up an issue that never occurred to me, as I've not been in the book business. There are a couple of answers. First of all, smaller print runs and more POD minimize the risk of printing too many books. This is happening anyway. Second, I assume that publishers can build in print risk to the price they ask for. If it's really only 25% of first copy cost, well that's only 25%. I imagine a heterogeneous channel. Tthe typical library-acquired OA title might have had a toll access run of a year or so; the publisher could capture the most eager purchasers using DRM'd delivery systems. Most libraries would wait for the discounted OA acquisition, thus creating a market segmentation similar to hardcover/paperback. Some publishers might try to sell books even before issue; it could work. Some books won't get bought at any price, let alone the cost to produce them; others would probably be bought even at an obscene profit margin. Some things won't change. Most libraries want to treat anyone who walks in the door as a patron. That gets sticky when you consider ebooks. It means DRM and access controls, which means a certain amount of hassle. One beautiful aspect of the open access ebook is that you don't need to invest in a delivery system. the OA books just piggyback on the delivery systems built for paid ebooks. The DRM incompatibilities between iPad, Kindle, Nook, Sony, Google etc just melt away. Certainly there will be content for which institutional access will be advantageous; but I can't believe this is true for all content. Eric Hellman President, Gluejar, Inc. 41 Watchung Plaza, #132 Montclair, NJ 07042 USA eric@hellman.net http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/ @gluejar
- Prev by Date: Oxford Journals 2011 Price List
- Next by Date: Institutional repositories and digital preservation
- Previous by thread: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Next by thread: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Index(es):