[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- From: "Michael Zeoli" <mzeoli@ybp.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:27:15 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Todd, This is in fact happening. At ALA annual many of the leading academic consortia (big and small) met with a group of university and trade press representatives to discuss these issues. It was a stepping stone and there will be more given the complexities and competing agendas, but the discussions and even some projects are already afoot. Michael Zeoli Director, Academic Library Consortia YBP Library Services ----- Original Message ----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Thu Aug 12 17:29:45 2010 Subject: RE: ebook acquisition collectives It seems to me that the Libraries are still having trouble switching their budget to apply to PRINT and E-Books equally. Not making any differentiation between them. If that is done they may actually find the money. However, I must point out a few nuances of my logic - by substituting some my own words. 1 - Ideally, libraries should be providing access to content to _their patrons_ at no additional charge. ( No library I know actually identifies "anyone" as their patron. Patrons do actually to pay for the resources through taxes, tuition, or company funds, etc.) 2 - Therefore, libraries should be trying to acquire rights to give ebooks by the most cost efficient means for the institution, library and patron. 3 - For ebooks, the coexistence of free access and toll access to a particular work _can be_ problematic 4. Every publisher has his _cost_ for any book. 5. The way for libraries to meet the publishers price for most books is to organize into a cooperative. 6. The amount of money libraries spend on books _may be_ sufficient to acquire outright many works sold mostly to libraries. Yet the question still remains : 7. So... why isn't this happening? TJP -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Hellman Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 5:54 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: ebook acquisition collectives I've been exploring the possibilities for open-access ebook acquisition collectives, with a bit of a twist. My logic goes like this. 1. Ideally, libraries should be providing access to content to anyone for free 2. Therefore, libraries should be trying to acquire rights to give ebooks to anyone for free. 3. For ebooks, the coexistence of free access and toll access to a particular work is problematic 4. Every publisher has his price for any book. 5. The way for libraries to meet the publishers price for most books is to organize into a cooperative. 6. The amount of money libraries spend on books is sufficient to acquire outright many works sold mostly to libraries. 7. So... why isn't this happening? http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2010/08/library-monopsony-for-monographic-ebook.html Eric Hellman President, Gluejar, Inc. Montclair, NJ
- Prev by Date: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Next by Date: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Previous by thread: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Next by thread: Re: ebook acquisition collectives
- Index(es):