[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question re: end users indemnifying publisher/vendor
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: question re: end users indemnifying publisher/vendor
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:03:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I would be interested to know (if anyone has a clue) why a publisher would make this request. I don't see the legal exposure and am wondering if this is simply an instance of a legal department applying a principle mechanically. Joe Esposito On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Rebecca Kemp <rkemp@email.unc.edu> wrote: > I've run across a scenario where a publisher requires end users > to enter into an end user agreement in which the end user agrees > to indemnify the publisher. Is there any language that can be > used in the institutional license to mitigate this > indemnification? I think in this particular case, we're not going > to be able to change anything, but for my future reference, has > anyone had experience with a situation like this? > > --Rebecca > > Rebecca Kemp > E-Resources Acquisitions Librarian > CB#3938 Davis Library > UNC-Chapel Hill > Chapel Hill, NC 27514-8890 > >
- Prev by Date: Re: Ranking Web of Repositories: July 2010 Edition
- Next by Date: RE: question re: end users indemnifying publisher/vendor
- Previous by thread: question re: end users indemnifying publisher/vendor
- Next by thread: RE: question re: end users indemnifying publisher/vendor
- Index(es):