[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- From: "\"FrederickFriend\"" <ucylfjf@ucl.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:07:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jan, The more uncertainty there is about what universities and research funders are paying for in the hybrid OA business model, the less likely it is that the model will grow. There is already considerable suspicion about "double-dipping" across the world, and unless publishers are very open about the relationship between subscriptions and publication charges, the result will be that universities and funders will support only full OA journals or repository deposit. Currently the hybrid model is not living up to its promise of a reasonable solution for all stakeholders. Fred ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Velterop" <velteropvonleyden@btinternet.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 3:55 AM Subject: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing Fred, Of course there is something of a problem with 'hybrid' OA journals. The "Pay-Or-Go-Away" (POGA) model that PLoS, BMC, Hindawi, etc. use, is easier to grasp by everybody. However, hybrid journals are a reasonable transition model, as an instant wholesale flip to POGA journals is not realistic. Jan Velterop
- Prev by Date: RE: iPhone 4 for scholars
- Next by Date: FW: Publisher pricing freezes for 2011 - Information sought
- Previous by thread: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Next by thread: Re: Springer Open Choice uptake affects 2011 journal pricing
- Index(es):