[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UC v. NPG
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: UC v. NPG
- From: Richard Poynder <richard.poynder@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:32:54 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Apropos of this list members might be interested in an interview with an equity analyst about Elsevier: http://poynder.blogspot.com/2010/06/reed-elsevier-need-for-progressive.html On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu> wrote: > Is this the straw that will break the camel's back? > >>From today's Chronicle: > > http://chronicle.com/article/U-of-California-Tries-Just/65823/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en > > The University of California system has said "enough" to the > Nature Publishing Group, one of the leading commercial > scientific publishers, over a big proposed jump in the cost of > the group's journals. > > On Tuesday, a letter went out to all of the university's > faculty members from the California Digital Library, which > negotiates the system's deals with publishers, and the > University Committee on Library and Scholarly Communication. > The letter said that Nature proposed to raise the cost of > California's license for its journals by 400 percent next year. > If the publisher won't negotiate, the letter said, the system > may have to take "more drastic actions" with the help of the > faculty. Those actions could include suspending subscriptions > to all of the Nature Group journals the California system buys > access to-67 in all, including Nature.... > > The story has an embedded link to the letter. > > Sandy Thatcher
- Prev by Date: Re: Electronic OA plus print on demand model for books
- Next by Date: ALCTS Scholarly Communications Interest Group Meeting in Washington, DC at ALA Annual
- Previous by thread: RE: UC v. NPG
- Next by thread: Re: UC v. NPG
- Index(es):