[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Gold OA funds as generalised "subvention funds"?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Gold OA funds as generalised "subvention funds"?
- From: "Richard Poynder" <richard.poynder@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:11:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
-----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito Sent: 05 June 2010 01:05 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Interview w/Sarah Pritchard, Univ. librarian, Northwestern U. Joe Esposito wrote: Make the text free online and sell the print version? How long will that tactic last? Is no one in the OA world paying attention to what is happening with the Amazon Kindle, the Apple iPad, and even the Barnes & Noble Nook? And the gorilla has not yet entered the market: Google Editions, due probably in July. Book professionals are now forecasting that in five years, 25% of the book market will be electronic. How can anyone expect to sell print under these circumstances? Is the academy the only segment of the society that does NOT believe that books are going digital? Please, test this for yourself. Buy an iPad, put 3-4 books on it, and then tell me what this will do to your future consumption of print. Whatever the virtues of OA, financing it through anticipated print sales is not a long-term strategy. *** Richard Poynder Replies: Personally I remain agnostic on this issue. But perhaps a more salient point made by Sarah Pritchard in the Information Today interview is that university presses - particularly those focused on the humanities - invariably have to be subsidised in order to be able to carry on publishing. In this regard Sarah Pritchard makes an interesting suggestion about the use of the so-called Gold OA funds that are being created at a growing number of universities (http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/OA_journal_funds). Her suggestion is that these funds should be used not just to support author-pays OA, but as more generalised "subvention funds". As she puts it, "[T]he model I see is one in which you have a pool of money that can be considered research funds. These funds might be used for page charges in a commercial subscription journal, they might be used as a subvention for a university press, or they might be used to pay OA charges. All three of those things are basically undergirding the same process: getting the material out there." http://www.infotoday.com/it/jun10/Poynder.shtml Richard Poynder
- Prev by Date: Re: Interview w/Sarah Pritchard, Univ. librarian, Northwestern U.
- Next by Date: Re: Interview w/Sarah Pritchard, Univ. librarian, Northwestern U.
- Previous by thread: Last call for MLA survey responses
- Next by thread: Re: Gold OA funds as generalised "subvention funds"?
- Index(es):