[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The access problem -- small, medium, or large?
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: The access problem -- small, medium, or large?
- From: Jim Stemper <stemp003@umn.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 00:14:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:42:28 EDT, Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>wrote: "Harnad is hoping to replace the small problem of access with the large problem of fiscal recklessness." The Research Information Network's 2009 study "Overcoming Barriers: Access to Research Information Content" goes to some lengths to show that the access problem is not "small." Some excerpts: Of the 800 respondents, over 40% said that they were unable readily to access licensed content at least weekly; and two-thirds at least monthly. The key reasons for failing to secure access were perceived to be [...] that the library had not purchased a licence for the content, because of budgetary constraints (56%). Around 59 per cent of respondents thought that non-availability of content does have some impact on their research, while 18 per cent say the impact is 'significant' either in terms of timing and/or comprehensiveness and/or other quality impact.
- Prev by Date: Re: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by Date: RE: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Previous by thread: RSNA Librarian Guide Website Press Release
- Next by thread: Fwd: The access problem -- small, medium, or large?
- Index(es):