[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Costs of peer-review (Was: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Costs of peer-review (Was: May issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter)
- From: Peter Davenport <peterr.davenport@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 22:53:40 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Richard Dodenhoff, American Society for Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics has said: >The notion that peer review is free or low cost is based on >misinformation..... >We publish four journals that have "volunteer" editors and >editorial boards. It's a rather bare-bones operation with >minimal staff who handled 2,508 submissions in 2009. Peer >review for those journals for 2009 cost about $700,000. Would any other publisher on this list care to comment on how these figures stack up against their experience? What does Elsevier spend on Editors for instance? Do any hard data on editorial (staff) costs exist in the public domain? Peter R Davenport
- Prev by Date: Re: peer review costs
- Next by Date: Re: Costs of peer-review (Was: May issue of the SPARC Open Access =
- Previous by thread: Re: peer review costs
- Next by thread: Re: Costs of peer-review (Was: May issue of the SPARC Open Access =
- Index(es):