[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- From: Heather Morrison <hgmorris@sfu.ca>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:54:33 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dennis Dillon wrote: We believe that there is ample room in the market for fewer books to be purchased on speculation, and for more publisher revenue to be generated by usage-based pricing, patron-driven selection, and print- on-demand options. Moving to usage-based pricing and patron-driven selection means publishers and librarians have to rethink some paradigms and be more in tune with their readers, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. Comment: As Dillon reports, the University of Texas is using usage-based pricing along with other models, including careful selection by subject specialists. Patron-driven selection and print-on-demand are not the same as usage- based pricing. Question: Between the time Mendel worked out the basics of heredity and people began to pay attention to this work, there was about a century's gap. If every library was purchasing on the basis of demand, would this work have been lost? Heather Morrison, MLIS The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
- Prev by Date: RE: Library Roles Changing, Open Access Not Compelling
- Next by Date: Washington's slightly overdue books
- Previous by thread: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Next by thread: Re: Usage-based pricing (was ebooks in libraries a thorny problem)
- Index(es):