[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OA strategies
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: OA strategies
- From: Bernd-Christoph Kaemper <bernd-christoph.kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:23:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
John, the problem with "free backfiles" as on HighWire (and similar policies by other publishers) is that the publisher may reconsider and put the content back under toll access, as long as content is not declared Open Access and being harvested in parallel in e.g. PubMedCentral. E.g., NPG did so with a full year of content when they took over publication of EMBO Reports from OUP and changed the backfile policy from "free after one year every January" to "free after 12 months". Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library John Sack schrieb: > Ann, > > I hope I've understood your question correctly about open > backfiles. > > There are 261 journals at HighWire where a recent or extended > backfile is available for free as I think you describe below. > For these journals, the current content would be > subscription-based, and the recent back content (e.g., a year > or more old) is open. (Other sites are completely open, and > others have free trial periods running.) (...) ****
- Prev by Date: 25th Annual NASIG Conference
- Next by Date: Re: Implications of the Georgia State e-reserves case
- Previous by thread: RE: OA strategies
- Next by thread: Social media for scientists
- Index(es):