[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO
- From: William Park <wpark@deepdyve.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:27:57 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I always assumed libraries would be limited in the # of concurrent users. If the movement is towards a licensing fee that libraries have to pay based on usage, then I imagine libraries will pass some/all of that fee to users and you've basically got an online book rental store. Conversely, if Amazon begins renting books, then what will the library of the future look like? -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:07 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO I haven't spoken with John Sargent about this particular item, but there may be some context for his remarks to bear in mind. First, let me mention that Sargent came up through the ranks in children's books. I was in a meeting with him in the 1980s where he talked about the importance of the public library market for his program. (For some segments of the children's market, libraries are half the business--unlike adult trade, where libraries are perhaps 3-4% of the business, though it all depends on who is counting.) He was then, and I assume he is now, attentive to the needs of constituencies beyond his shareholders (but if you forget them . . . ). For consumer publishers, "libraries" almost always and exclusively means "public libraries." Academic libraries are not on the radar screen. The context of library discussions among trade publishers today is, How can we sell ebooks to public libraries without destroying our consumer sales? This is a very real problem, and if there is a good solution, I have not yet seen it. If an ebook is sold to a library and if it can be checked out remotely by anyone with a library card and an Internet connection, AND if there is no limitation as to the number of simultaneous users, then why would anyone buy the book instead of simply getting it from the library? One solution that is being kicked around is for public libraries to purchase/license ebooks for their districts, with compensation based either on population (the equivalent of FTE pricing) or varying with usage ("this ebook carries no charge to the library until it is checked out; each check out will result in a charge of $____"). I don't know how this will play out, but Sargent is someone librarians can work with. Joe Esposito On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Rick Anderson <rick.anderson@utah.edu> wrote: > Sargent's comments are intriguing, in particular the quote that > Chuck pulled: > >> "If there's a model where the publisher gets a piece of the >> action every time the book is borrowed, that's an interesting >> model." > > I anticipate that many of my colleagues will bristle at this > suggestion, mainly because we don't like the idea of any > corporation getting a "piece of the action" when the action in > question is a patron borrowing a book. But of course, the word > "borrow" becomes immensely complicated in the ebook realm -- > "lending" can mean anything from (at one extreme) outright > distribution of unlimited copies to all comers at one extreme, > to (at the other extreme) time-limited read-only access to text > through a single handheld device passed from patron to patron. > > Then there's the question of what "a piece of the action" might > actually mean in this context. =What's the action, and how big > a piece does Sargent want? =What if the library's "acquisition" > of the ebook in question amounted only to provision of a > gateway into the book's content, and the library gets > microcharged with every access? > > There are enormous opportunities here, in part because the > potential number of models is limitless. I hope the forces of > reaction (on both sides of the library/publisher divide) don't > stymie the innovative possibilities. > > Rick Anderson > Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections > Marriott Library > Univ. of Utah > rick.anderson@utah.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Discovering Others' Contracts?
- Next by Date: Re: copyright fraud?
- Previous by thread: RE: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO
- Next by thread: RE: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO
- Index(es):