[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- From: Eric Hellman <eric@hellman.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:51:41 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I think it would be interesting for all to see how publishers would itemize the expenses associated with review process. My guess is that many of the items would be unanticipated by non-publishers but still scaleable. On Feb 25, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Anthony Watkinson wrote: > Is Professor Guedon really suggesting that publishers who spend a > lot of money on online editorial systems, on editor honoraria, on > editorial back-up costs and on editorial board meetings are > really doing so because they want to increase their costs? The > software he mentions may well work for small journals in the > humanities but it is my understanding that it does not satisfy > editors of biomedical journals or their authors:. > > Anthony
- Prev by Date: RE: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- Next by Date: Journal publishing costs
- Previous by thread: RE: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- Next by thread: New online materials adds to over a century of research
- Index(es):