[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- From: "Nawin Gupta" <nawin@nawingupta.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:36:50 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yes, peer reviewers are rarely paid, but there are significant costs involved in facilitating and managing the peer review process, and addressing/incorporating comments of reviewers during revision cycles (these costs are higher for journals with a double-blind peer-review). Also, lower the acceptance rate, higher the cost per accepted paper as each rejected paper has a cost associated with it. For a journal with acceptance rate of 10%, $100 per submitted article review cost becomes $1,000 per published article. Nawin Gupta INFORMED PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS, INC. Phone +1 773-623-9199 or +1 773-685-2007 nawin@nawingupta.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Feinman Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:10 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told What is the relation between cost and peer review? I thought peer reviewers are not paid. Richard David Feinman Professor of Cell Biology SUNY Downstate Medical Center (718) 871-1374 FAX: (718) 270-3316 **********
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- Next by Date: RE: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- Next by thread: RE: Open Access to Research Is Inevitable, Libraries Are Told
- Index(es):