[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modern Language Association CFP
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: Modern Language Association CFP
- From: richards1000@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:12:58 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sandy: Like many on this list, I have great respect for your leadership at PSU and among university presses, and for your accomplishments in innovation. To address your comment about the subtitle of the session, I think it's entirely possible that in the near future some faculty will be granted tenure on the basis of work other than formal scholarly publications: e.g., data sets, blog posts, multimedia presentations, virtual conference presentations, original software programs, databases, or algorithms, that are subject to informal peer review after their release on the free Web. I think the first to obtain tenure on the basis of such a record will be younger scholars who are extremely smart, are extremely skilled at applying technology to research questions in their fields, and are excellent and popular teachers, and who will refuse to write traditional, formal articles and monographs. I think that the intense competition among colleges and universities will result in strong demand for these scholars (note that they are likely to be great teachers as well as innovative thinkers), and that the tenure system will have to yield to them. I bet there will be a quite small number of these scholars at first, but the changes they compel in the tenure standards will eventually affect most junior faculty. I think this vision is consistent with the current trend in scholarly communication toward shorter, more informal documents and review processes. Robert C. Richards, Jr., J.D., M.S.L.I.S., M.A. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandy Thatcher" <sgt3@psu.edu> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 10:36:07 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: Modern Language Association CFP What on earth is the subtitle of this session supposed to mean? The premise of the session seems flawed to begin with: despite all the technological innovation we have witnessed, the actual forms of the journal and the monograph have changed very little. Most journals still package articles into issues and number groups of issues by an annual volume; the vast majority of monographs produced, whether in electronic format or print, still resemble the books we all grew up with. The experiments to try out different forms of publication, like Gutenberg-e, have largely failed, in part because promotion and tenure practices have not changed at all. E-textbooks have yet to catch on in the college market, despite the efforts of CourseSmart and other publishing enterprises. Where is this "revolution" in scholarly communication? Many of us are still waiting for it to happen.... Sandy Thatcher Penn State University Press >The Paradigm Shift in Scholarly Communication: Will Publications >Perish? > >A Collaborative Session Proposed by the CELJ (Council of Editors >of Learned Journals) and the American Library Association Los >Angeles - MLA Convention- Jan. 6-9, 2011. > >The scholarly essay, once the coin of the realm in academia, is >being transformed by digital technologies, which have enabled >instant and open access through electronic publishing. This >revolution has changed the landscape of every aspect of scholarly >publishing. The transformation has been so rapid and so >dramatic, that there has been very little opportunity to assess, >adjust, and respond to the impact on scholarly communication. >The very question about the future viability of learned journals, >to say nothing of practices such as peer review, confronts us all >as professionals who rely on the integrity of discourse. This >session is an effort to deal with those questions directly and >initiate a dialogue about how various branches of the scholarly >community (editors, authors, publishers, and librarians) can >respond to ongoing and inevitable challenges. > >Submit - 1 page proposal for a roundtable exchange to Alan Rauch >(arauch@uncc.edu) by March 15, 2010. > >(Participants MUST be members of the MLA.) > >ALAN RAUCH >President - Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts >Department of English >The University of North Carolina at Charlotte >9201 University City Boulevard >Charlotte, NC 28223 > >arauch@uncc.edu >http://alanrauch.com
- Prev by Date: Email Eprint Request Button: Too good for OA's own good?
- Next by Date: Re: Modern Language Association CFP
- Previous by thread: RE: Modern Language Association CFP
- Next by thread: Re: Modern Language Association CFP
- Index(es):