[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sub-sidy/cription for ArXiv
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Sub-sidy/cription for ArXiv
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:16:54 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At 6:21 PM -0500 1/27/10, Stevan Harnad wrote: >So the only thing that is true in what "Simon says" is that when >all papers are available OA as peer-reviewed final drafts (and >sometimes also supplemented earlier by the prerefereeing drafts) >there is no longer any need for users or authors to consult the >journal's proprietary version of record. (They can just cite it, >sight unseen.) Maybe this would be acceptable if all one were doing was discussing the basic ideas conveyed in an article and citing the VoR as the source, but it would be dangerous to rely on the postprint solely and quote from it since the final editing may well have caught errors and made other changes in the peer-reviewed draft. Sanford G. Thatcher Executive Editor for Social Sciences and Humanities Penn State University Press Frisco, TX 75034-5514 e-mail: sgt3@psu.edu Phone: (214) 705-9010 http://www.psupress.org
- Prev by Date: CRL certifies Portico as trustworthy digital repository
- Next by Date: Re: ArXiv Grows Up, Adopts Subscription-like Model
- Previous by thread: Re: Sub-sidy/cription for ArXiv
- Next by thread: RE: Sub-sidy/cription for ArXiv
- Index(es):