[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:04:39 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Any change in policy will affect someone or something. I find it curious that there is little attention being paid to the implications of the embargo. The assumption is that the economics of the "system" can be maintained provided that everybody agrees to protect the revenues of current issues. If all publishers were current issues publishers, and if all revenue derived from journals were for current issues, then this might seem like a matter of no importance. But I suggest that librarians look around to see if they are indeed paying money for materials that are not current issues. What will happen to those materials and the services that deliver them? This is catch-and-release publishing: invest in a product, but then return it to the wild. It is humane, but ultimately unsustainable, and, of course, that which is unsustainable cannot be sustained. In a separate post, Sandy Thatcher comments that the implications for monographs has not yet been taken up. Typically, monograph publishers earn 55-60% of their revenue from their backlists. A catch-and-release policy will literally stop the entire monograph industry in its tracks. Presumably humanities faculty need not publish a book any more in order to receive tenure and promotion. Joe Esposito On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Sally Morris <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk> wrote: > I fully agree with Sandy about the significance of the report. > It is hugely encouraging that the majority of players all endorse > an evolutionary (rather than revolutionary) approach towards a > shared objective of maximizing access to research scholarship > without harming the value-added publishing process. > > It is encouraging that the OSTP saw fit to seek advice from such > a balanced group - which certainly doesn't happen everywhere - > and I very much hope that they, and the various research funding > agencies, will heed the group's advice. > > Sally Morris
- Prev by Date: Re: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
- Next by Date: Re: STM responds to U. S. Scholarly Publishing Roundtable Report
- Previous by thread: Re: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
- Next by thread: Re: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
- Index(es):