[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In praise of reckless enthusiasm
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: In praise of reckless enthusiasm
- From: "James D. Jordan" <jj2143@columbia.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:26:46 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
One hesitates to cast a pall over the "semi success" of Gutenberg-e which involved the efforts of many talented people, and produced interesting results. I for one wish it had begun with a business plan as intelligent and scalable as the one that drove Muse which has succeeded beyond the expectations of the original parties concerned. Our good colleagues in the Columbia Libraries bore the larger share of its cost overruns. Sandy may overestimate the capital capabilities of "the larger presses." Yes, reckless enthusiasm with the capital to support it (but I think that's wreckless enthusiasm). On Jan 14, 2010, at 8:34 PM, Sandy Thatcher wrote: > I think good examples of "reckless enthusiasm" were the ACLS > History (now Humanities) E-Book and Gutenberg-e projects that > sprang from the fertile imagination of Robert Darnton, famous > book historian, former Princeton history professor, and now > Harvard librarian. While some of us on the advisory committee for > these projects (like me and Ann Okerson) advised Bob that they > likely would prove to be unsustainable economically beyond the > term of the Mellon Foundation grants that gave birth to them, I > think we are all glad they happened anyway because we have > learned a great deal from them in their semi-failure. (I say > "semi" because they both live on in attenuated form.) > > I would add that, for university press publishing in particular, > where capital is in very short supply for experimentation, it > behooves most presses not to be the pioneers but to let the > larger presses that can afford to do so, backed by foundation > grants if need be, forge ahead with "reckless enthusiasm" and try > out new things, which the smaller presses can then adopt, or not, > once the concept has been proven and the bugs worked out. Among > such projects in the past couple of decades I would place in this > category are the National Academies Press experiment with "open > access" monograph publishing (which Michigan and Penn State are > applying to humanities publishing), Project Muse at Johns > Hopkins, and Chicago's launch of the BiblioVault (the last two > also supported by Mellon). > > So I'm all for "reckless enthusiasm" just so long as you have the > capital needed to take risks and still survive if you fail! > > Sandy Thatcher > Penn State University Press > >
- Prev by Date: Job posting: Assoc. Dean for Collections and Technology
- Next by Date: RE: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
- Previous by thread: Re: In praise of reckless enthusiasm
- Next by thread: Fwd: [SPARC-IR] Share your views on public access: New phase
- Index(es):