[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Changing the game
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Changing the game
- From: Gu�don Jean-Claude <jean.claude.guedon@umontreal.ca>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:23:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
My suggestion to researchers is to look at publishers' claims with a critical and probing mind and not accept them aat face value. The functions mentioned by Sally may turn out to be quite limited indeed. As for the relative importance of researchers and publishers, I will let readers decide which ranking for them. jcg -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Sally Morris Sent: Tue 10/6/2009 10:22 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Changing the game I agree with J-C that publishers are not, in themselves, important; however neither, as an end in themselves, are researchers - the point of research is to benefit society. It does appear, though, that in pursuing their aims researchers do find some of the functions currently carried out by publishers are actually helpful. Sally Morris
- Prev by Date: RE: Changing the game
- Next by Date: Press release - JISC Collections to acquire Content Complete Ltd
- Previous by thread: RE: Changing the game
- Next by thread: RE: Changing the game
- Index(es):