[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: settling a dispute

I think the access has to be limited to faculty, staff, and students (or the
university community). Also, I believe that we have to address this on a
case-by-case basis. I don't think any book should be available to anyone
just because a library purchases it or owns it. If I were to go through all
of the pains of writing a book, there has to be some sort of opportunity to
make a profit from it. In other words - perhaps some sort of a compromise
can be made to provide access to content on some sort of secure platform
with restrictions on duplication. However, it cannot be all one way.
Especially in this economy when one's hard work should warrant the
opportunity to gain a profit. For certain voices in our field to say it
should all be free, is not at all a fair approach.

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>wrote:

> I wonder if the listmembers could help to settle a dispute.  The
> topic is what constitutes fair use of books in libraries.
> It is my view that some members (I don't know what percentage) of
> the academic library community believe that educational fair use
> covers the digitization of a book owned by the library, that the
> digital edition can be put on a Web server, and that the material
> can be made available at least to members of the institution
> (faculty and students).  Some librarians may also believe that
> the server can be accessible to the open Web, as the book was
> hosted by an educational institution.
> The opposing view is that digitized copies are covered by fair
> use only when they are put in a dark archive for preservation
> purposes.
> The question here is not what is the law (a complex question),
> but what do librarians think the law is.
> Can anyone offer an opinion?
> Thank you.
> Joe Esposito