[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
un-Nature-al (beware of rant below)
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: un-Nature-al (beware of rant below)
- From: David Thibodeau <David.Thibodeau@gcsu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:58:08 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This year our subscription to Scientific American went up from $39.95/year to $299.00/year. As a result of Scientific American becoming a wholy owned and operated entity within Nature Publishing Group in April they are now subject to their tier pricing scam. While SciAm was nice to have around for the last 150 years plus, it is a magazine and not a necessary part of our academic collection. It did, however, have a place in academia, primarily on the display rack for our humanities students. What are the folks over at Nature thinking??? A modest price increase would have been tolerable but this is absurd. Surely the title was still profitable, does anyone know differntly? I am not a sentimentalist and I am all for online news but this is more disturbing than the collapse of the print newspaper industry. ----- End forwarded message -----
- Prev by Date: Re: PLOS article metrics
- Next by Date: Dramatic Growth of Open Access: September 30, 2009
- Previous by thread: RE: Changing the game
- Next by thread: RE: un-Nature-al (beware of rant below)
- Index(es):